Hello Albert,

as nobody has yet replied, I'm trying.
Generally, you can have multiple routes on the same ways by using relations
(type=route), see the wiki for more information if needed.
Ref tags on ways can be used as long as there is just one route on the
segment, but they fail otherwise.

Still generally, you can add ref tags for routes, IMHO regardless of them
being signed or not, as long as you can verifiably demonstrate that the
route exists even on those unsigned parts (e.g. official documents that are
publicly accessible). There might also be gaps in a route, it is not a
given that every route will be uninterrupted, so you'd have to find out
whether the route on those unsigned parts "is there" but not signed, or is
interrupted (hence would not be tagged).

AFAIK, routing software never "relies" on relations, relations are there to
get the possibility to reuse existing geometry without duplicating it, they
provide you with another object, so you can e.g. add several routes on the
same highway, while maintaining a logical structure (one relation object
per route or direction of a route). Whether you'd add the unsigned parts on
the relation depends on the
outcome of your research about the route being interrupted or not (see
above), but you are of course right that you'd either need an additional
relation (part) for the unsigned parts or loose the information that the
route is not signed there. My preference would be to add it to the same
relation and loose the "unsigned" information.

personally, I don't think "unsigned_ref" is a good tag, as it still refers
to a "ref", so I would put a "ref" tag and if you want another tag that
says the ref is not signed (e.g. ref=PA 235 unsigned_ref=yes, but
admittedly, according to taginfo this is not how it is done), but it might
be discutable and if you'd really want to emphasize that there are no
signs, it would seem a good way to do it.

Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to