Hi all, Please have a look to man_made=cutline https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline
This can be extended to other landuses to mark such a reserve. Corresponding pipeline section can be tagged with this accordingly, but since it doesn't have anything to do with network, I'd prefer a dedicated way beside. All the best *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux <http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux> 2017-02-08 13:36 GMT+01:00 Ross Scanlon <i...@4x4falcon.com>: > Agree Dave. > > As I said it could be a park but without on the ground survey or other > info it's unknown. > > These are quite often parks and should be tagged as leisure=park but > onwards from that is the reason it is a park. > > In these situations the park could also be a reserve or easement for the > pipe line. > > The discussion on talk_au was that it could be tagged leisure=park > park=pipeline_reserve. > > Cheers > Ross > > > > On 08/02/17 22:02, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > Thanks Ross, > > It *might *be a park but we can't be sure. The mapper only says > source=Bing. For all we know he's merely making an educated guess. His > changeset comment suggests he has also added some "pipeline reserves" > although a quick look doesn't turn any up. > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Ross Scanlon <i...@4x4falcon.com> wrote: > >> This is the aerial imagery of the area the original poster is talking >> about: >> >> https://binged.it/2kN1tfC >> >> To all intents it could be a park. >> >> In osm it's at: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073 >> >> Cheers >> >> Ross >> >> >> >> On 08/02/17 19:51, Dave Swarthout wrote: >> >> Yes, I see now you're asking about the land that the pipeline either runs >> over or through. >> >> I would avoid the term reserve, however. I generally think of a reserve >> as a larger area, often a park or historic area, e.g., the Gabo Island >> Lighthouse Reserve in Canada or the Hinchinbrook Lighthouse Reserve, >> which is a Park in Valdez-Cordova County, Alaska. There is also this >> reserve which is related to your illustration; the huge area known as the >> National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, but I would not want it to be >> confused with your tagging targets. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Petroleum_Reserve%E2%80%93Alaska >> >> Maybe landuse=pipeline would be a good pick? >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 08-Feb-17 06:51 PM, François Lacombe wrote: >>> >>> Hi Warin, >>> >>> Do you have pictures of such areas plz ? >>> >>> I don't see anything corresponding to 'reserve' >>> >>> All the best >>> >>> >>> Not personally ... and it is a fair way away. As I say .. reported on >>> the Australian group. >>> I assume there is a sign locally to advise on the 'pipeline reserve'. >>> >>> Gas pipe lines cover fair distances in Australia .. >>> >>> One line is 1,300 km here https://www.apa.com.au/our-ser >>> vices/gas-transmission/east-coast-grid/moomba-sydney-pipeline/ >>> >>> The reserve might be up to 25 meters wide from >>> https://www.seagas.com.au/safety/ >>> Photo of their warning sign http://www.seagas.com.au/wp-co >>> ntent/uploads/2014/01/danger.jpg >>> I have seen similar signs for gas and fibre optic lines in my >>> wanderings, some warning of a restriction in use of area above the line - >>> thus advising of a restrictive reserve. >>> >>> There will be local storm water, potable water lines too. >>> Long distant buried communication lines too, a number over 8,500 km. At >>> least some of these will have 'reserves' evident on the surface. >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 8 févr. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> That tags the pipe line itself. >>>> >>>> The request is to tag the area set aside for a pipe line ... a reserve. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08-Feb-17 04:38 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: >>>> >>>> There is already a tagging structure for pipelines that takes into >>>> account whether it's underground or overground. See >>>> >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252 >>>> >>>> for a section of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. However, the land area >>>> above the pipeline, which is restricted for casual access throughout >>>> Alaska, has no special tagging. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> A question came up on the Australian list that would be more >>>>> appropriate here. >>>>> >>>>> "My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline >>>>> reserves. >>>>> >>>>> I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to have >>>>> >>>>> public access for walking at least. (One local one has a sign >>>>> disallowing golf...) Some others appear to be across private >>>>> land, and i'm less interested in those, I'd really like to >>>>> show those ones with public access. >>>>> >>>>> examples:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/- >>>>> 38.15997/145.20073 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've tagged them as leisure=park previously, and paths >>>>> evident on the ground have just been tagged highway=path. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas?" >>>>> >>>>> My comments: >>>>> >>>>> I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground and the >>>>> location is not evident so you cannot map the pipe line itself. >>>>> >>>>> As it is a landuse ... ? >>>>> I would tag landuse=pipeline >>>>> >>>>> However ... some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... these >>>>> have legal easements through the associated properties. >>>>> And these would be already tagged with a landuse. >>>>> >>>>> Humm power lines are mapped ... should there be similar provision for >>>>> other infrastructure? >>>>> Perhaps a 'infrastructure' tag that can be used for all? >>>>> infrastructure=pipeline >>>>> infrastructure=sewer >>>>> infrastructure=water >>>>> infrastructure=phone >>>>> >>>>> Note it should be used for the area that is affected by/reserved for >>>>> the infrastructure, not just the infrastructure itself? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dave Swarthout >>>> Homer, Alaska >>>> Chiang Mai, Thailand >>>> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing >>>> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.or >>>> g/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing >>> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.or >>> g/listinfo/tagging >> >> -- >> Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at >> http://dswarthout.blogspot.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing >> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.or >> g/listinfo/tagging > > -- > Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at > http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
