Yes, I see now you're asking about the land that the pipeline either runs over or through.
I would avoid the term reserve, however. I generally think of a reserve as a larger area, often a park or historic area, e.g., the Gabo Island Lighthouse Reserve in Canada or the Hinchinbrook Lighthouse Reserve, which is a Park in Valdez-Cordova County, Alaska. There is also this reserve which is related to your illustration; the huge area known as the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, but I would not want it to be confused with your tagging targets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Petroleum_Reserve%E2%80%93Alaska Maybe landuse=pipeline would be a good pick? On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08-Feb-17 06:51 PM, François Lacombe wrote: > > Hi Warin, > > Do you have pictures of such areas plz ? > > I don't see anything corresponding to 'reserve' > > All the best > > > Not personally ... and it is a fair way away. As I say .. reported on the > Australian group. > I assume there is a sign locally to advise on the 'pipeline reserve'. > > Gas pipe lines cover fair distances in Australia .. > > One line is 1,300 km here https://www.apa.com.au/our- > services/gas-transmission/east-coast-grid/moomba-sydney-pipeline/ > > The reserve might be up to 25 meters wide from https://www.seagas.com.au/ > safety/ > Photo of their warning sign http://www.seagas.com.au/wp- > content/uploads/2014/01/danger.jpg > I have seen similar signs for gas and fibre optic lines in my wanderings, > some warning of a restriction in use of area above the line - thus advising > of a restrictive reserve. > > There will be local storm water, potable water lines too. > Long distant buried communication lines too, a number over 8,500 km. At > least some of these will have 'reserves' evident on the surface. > > > > Le 8 févr. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> That tags the pipe line itself. >> >> The request is to tag the area set aside for a pipe line ... a reserve. >> >> >> >> On 08-Feb-17 04:38 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: >> >> There is already a tagging structure for pipelines that takes into >> account whether it's underground or overground. See >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252 >> >> for a section of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. However, the land area above >> the pipeline, which is restricted for casual access throughout Alaska, has >> no special tagging. >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> A question came up on the Australian list that would be more appropriate >>> here. >>> >>> "My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline reserves. >>> >>> I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to have >>> >>> public access for walking at least. (One local one has a sign >>> disallowing golf...) Some others appear to be across private >>> land, and i'm less interested in those, I'd really like to >>> show those ones with public access. >>> >>> examples:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/- >>> 38.15997/145.20073 >>> >>> >>> I've tagged them as leisure=park previously, and paths >>> evident on the ground have just been tagged highway=path. >>> >>> >>> Any ideas?" >>> >>> My comments: >>> >>> I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume underground and the >>> location is not evident so you cannot map the pipe line itself. >>> >>> As it is a landuse ... ? >>> I would tag landuse=pipeline >>> >>> However ... some pipe lines cross farms, residential areas ... these >>> have legal easements through the associated properties. >>> And these would be already tagged with a landuse. >>> >>> Humm power lines are mapped ... should there be similar provision for >>> other infrastructure? >>> Perhaps a 'infrastructure' tag that can be used for all? >>> infrastructure=pipeline >>> infrastructure=sewer >>> infrastructure=water >>> infrastructure=phone >>> >>> Note it should be used for the area that is affected by/reserved for the >>> infrastructure, not just the infrastructure itself? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Swarthout >> Homer, Alaska >> Chiang Mai, Thailand >> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing >> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.or >> g/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
