On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:46:36AM +0100, Dave F wrote: > But it's *not a tunnel*
that makes 2 votes for covered=building_passage and phasing out tunnel=building_passage Richard > > On 10/09/2016 12:23, Simone Saviolo wrote: > >Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :) > > > >Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a > >colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and colonnades > >have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the building is over > >the highway, but it might even mean that a protruding balcony "covers" the > >way. > > > >Regards, > > > >Simone > > > >2016-09-10 13:09 GMT+02:00 Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com > ><mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>>: > > > > Hmm... > > The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me. > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage > > <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage> > > > > Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624) > > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered > > <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered> > > > > I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be a > > tunnel it would need to be below natural ground (ie a mountain or > > river bed). > > These 'building_passage' all appear to be at ground level. > > > > Is there a difference I'm not aware of? > > > > Dave F. > > > > On 10/09/2016 11:42, LeTopographeFou wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've noticed several typo errors in tag values. I would like to > >> fix them when it is obvious. When they all came from one user, > >> it's easy to contact him and agree on a fix. When it's worldwide > >> and multi contributors it becomes difficult to identify the right > >> contributor for each tag and contact them one by one (unless > >> there is a tool to say "this value for this key of this/those > >> object(s) have been assigned by Xxx, Yyy..."). In all cases I > >> want to document the edit in the wiki. But do I have to ask for a > >> vote/discussion for automated typo edits? The wiki is unclear on > >> this point. > >> > >> So I've made a proposal here for a first edit: > >> > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage > >> > >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/LeTopographeFou#.23002_-_Typos_with_tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage> > >> > >> Thank you for your feedback > >> > >> * vote is ok > >> * don't worry, document and do when it's obvious > >> * edit one by one/contact authors one by one > >> * do nothing and let the time do his work > >> * are you silly? automated edits are evil for typos! > >> * ... ? > >> > >> > >> Yours, > >> -- LeTopographeFou > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Tagging mailing list > >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Tagging mailing list > >Tagging@openstreetmap.org > >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
