LeTopographeFou wrote: > But do I have to ask for a vote/discussion for automated typo edits?
Very expressly no. There is no precedent for voting on automated edits, and on the rare occasions it has been suggested then there has been significant and well-founded opposition to the idea. From the Automated Edits Code of Conduct: "We do not require or recommend a formal vote, but if there is significant objection to your plan - and even minorities may be significant! - then change it or drop it altogether." In this case you're changing, I think, just 22 objects in total for things that can't be interpreted as anything but typos. I suggest you just go ahead and do it. :) Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Typo-fix-for-tunnel-building-passage-and-how-to-proceed-in-the-future-tp5882268p5882288.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
