John Willis wrote: > How is a data provider supposed to make assumptions of what a particular > path is when there is no place to start from?
I presume you mean "data consumer", and as the data consumer who probably parses path tags in more detail than any other (for cycle.travel), I do fine, thanks. highway=footway|cycleway|track, surface=*, tracktype=*, width=*, and access tags are plenty sufficient. There are two significant issues I encounter with path tagging and neither of them are a lack of highway values: - missing surface tags - highway=path, which should die in a fire I do wish people who aren't data consumers would stop second-guessing those who are, because they invariably miss the point by a country 1.609km. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Subject-Feature-Proposal-RFC-highway-social-path-tp5870639p5875556.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
