John Willis <jo...@mac.com> writes: >> On Jun 12, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: >> >> make the official/important trails thicker than the minor ones > > +1 > > Highway=trail
I don't think we need to change path to trail. It's basically the same thing. > Subkey: > Trail=main (usually there is some backbone path that all trails branch out > from in a large park.) > Trail=official (officially designated trails in a park, where that matters) I agree there should be some tag to show that a trail/path is the main one. I don't think official/not-official should be related to main/not. I would agree that main tends to be official, but it seems that the world is complicated and if two things are separate we might was well keep them separate. > Trail=unofficial / social (shortcuts in a park or a city) trail:official=no seems fine for any trail which is not sanctioned by the authorities. (I don't see why you say park or city; anyplace there is a notion that some places are official then others can be not.) > Trail=illegal (social cuts that exist but are specifically illegal > because of posted signage to stay on official trails, or ones that are > go into an area signed as "do not enter". This feels like osm veering into judgement; that sounds like a simple case of access=no. > Most should be mapped, but > perhaps not rendered - this would solve not only the different > renderings ability to render more detail, but also remove them from > the main map and keep people from "adding" them since they would be in > the mapping data already. ) A separate argument, but various renders can do whatever. I'd rather see them and have them marked as no-access or extra thin. I find it useful to orient to what trail I'm on by the geometry of the side trails.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
