On 28/01/2016, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28/01/2016 8:51 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> >> 2016-01-27 18:00 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com >> <mailto:molto...@gmail.com>>: >> >> You barely broach the subject of how MV and namespaces combine. For >> example if an object has multiple refs with sources, it should be >> clear wether an MV tag corresponds to "multiple sources for all the >> refs" or to "source for the 2nd ref". In suffix syntax, this could be >> distriinguished by "ref_1=x ref_2=y source_1:ref=a source_2:ref=b" vs >> "ref_1=x ref_2=y source:ref_1=a source:ref_2=b", even though this is >> becoming hairy. >> >> > Errr I would rather see > > ref_1=x > source:ref_1=y > > Keep the value the same from the first key to the delimited referrer = > makes it easier for all to recognise and sort.
Well that's one example I gave, so we agree ? You've simplified my usecase so it's hard to see what exactly you have in mind. How do we handle the usecase "this road has two refs A nd B, the source for ref A is X, the sources for ref B are Y and Z" ? IMHO this is easy to do with a suffix syntax: > ref_1=A > ref_2=B > source:ref_1=X > source_1:ref_2=Y > source_2:ref_2=Z but that needs to be understood and agreed uppon. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging