Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> writes: > Hmmm. > There is a problem. > We (cyclists) would like to be able to distinguish between ways that can be > used legally by bicycle, and > 1) that do not have any traffic sign saying this > and > 2) those where there is some kind of traffic sign saying explicitly that > this way can be used by cyclists
If that's what you want, map the signs. If a way can be legally used, then it shoudl be tagged as such, whether that's by observing signs or reading the law. > I assumed that this was the difference between > 1) bicycle=yes > and > 2) bicycle=designated No. bicycle=designated is an official notion that bicycles are someone more authorized than cars or foot and are to be considered the primary use of a way. An example would be a path that had signs saying that while pedestrians are allowed, they must yield to bikes. > Your proposal is well intended, but would water down the meaning of > "designated" and would make it equal to the simple "yes" That was my concern as well. Designated needs some sense of an official notion of primacy.
pgprGg2kwPQgK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
