W dniu 21.07.2015 13:03, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
much better, still 12 meters are a lot, if you think about standing in
front of an 8 meters high object, that's already pretty monumental.
That's why I added "or so". We can also add a practical hint, which is
BTW the real meaning and could be a definition for this flawed type:
"Hint: if one can't tell it's 'monumental', then it should be tagged as
historic=memorial."
***
Our current object categorization is sometimes a disaster and I hope one
day we'll fix it from the ground up. Then the monument (which by
definition is a memorial!) would be just an option, not an object in
itself, for example:
object=memorial (not even historic, because it may be built nowadays -
let's get rid of those compulsive categories!)
memorial=obelisk (just the shape type)
war_memorial=yes (to not mix detailed purpose with shapes)
monument=yes
--
"The train is always on time / The trick is to be ready to put your bags
down" [A. Cohen]we should
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
