@Martin - I'm not aware of any different types of USB socket - are you referring to USB 2.0, and USB 3.0?
If so, that can be handled by another tag, e.g. USB:version or USB:type. On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24/05/2015 7:06 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > Am 23.05.2015 um 20:08 schrieb pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com>: > > On 23 May 2015 at 17:47, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Wiki article clearly teaches that the amenity=charging_station tag >> was designed with vehicles in mind. >> > > Well if it's a VEHICLE charging station, it should have said that. They > didn't specify what changing it was in the name - so it's surely open for > all charging stations. > > > > I tend to agree but it makes rendering more difficult, maybe we should > make indeed a transition to vehicle_charging_station > > > Bit long winded... how about > > vehicle_charging .. for motor vehicles > > bicycle_charging .. for bicycles > > and > > power_socket .. for power sockets ... > > the are all different things .. with different appearances and > requirements. > > This would get away from those presently tagged and provide for a clean > definition. > > They could all use the same socket= tag just as they would use the same > access, fee tags. > > ---------------- > Maybe the boaties will have boat_charging too? :-) Just thinking > of the future. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
