+1 for solution 1. It's the most future-safe, it's easiest to explain, and most likely not to be misunderstood by new mappers. A few extra nodes is a small price.
Janko čet, 7. svi 2015. 18:49 Mike N <nice...@att.net> je napisao: I tend to migrate toward solution 1 in urban environments. It takes additional work, but in the end, it seems that routing applications have the richest and most accurate set of data to work with. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
