Honestly, this "approved" v. something else is a storm in a tea cup. The proposals have been (or not) approved. Yes, by a small minority of OSM mappers but ones who have thought about the proposal and they are not in any way an exclusive group.
It does not say compulsory, required or anything prescriptive, it just says the proposal has been "approved" and it has. Lets leave it there. David On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 09:01 +1000, Warin wrote: > On 5/04/2015 8:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:23 AM, moltonel 3x Combo > > <molto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One can try to write a page defining what "published" means > > in the > > context of wiki proposals. But given the current level of > > controversy, > > I wish the authors good luck :p > > > > > > This mailing list community veers toward nit picking and bike > > shedding, and tends to block rather than guide forward change. It's > > also a tiny fraction of the mapping community, which is sad. > > > > -------------------- > > > > "Published" in this sense means published on the wiki, > > By this definition a Draft proposal is published .. if taken > literally. > > > Published ... is not a 'good' word for the intended use. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
