What I mean is, does the software allow you to specify that only objects
with access permitting the general public, or access=private with only
specified values of the operator tag, be rendered?
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
On March 17, 2015 4:43:07 PM <jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me> wrote:
Not sure what you mean by “Private Objects”, anything in the DB is capable
of being displayed, depending on whether the Renderer wants to. Nothing is
Private in OSM.
Jonathan
-----------------------
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: John F. Eldredge
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2015 20:44
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Does the default rendering on the slippy map on OSM's main page show
private objects? If it does, then there is a loss of privacy. If it
doesn't, then there is a loss of feedback to mappers.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
On March 16, 2015 7:08:34 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/03/2015 10:46 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
"Please do not map private objects in private space. In general if
the object could create a privacy concern, or is just not useful to
a member of the public, please don't add it to the database. Note
it is fully OK to map facilities within membership or fee based venues,
as long as the facilities are reasonably available to members of the public."
Examples not to map: toilets in homes, employee only toilets in businesses,
private recycling bins, playgrounds in private homes or day care facilities.
Examples to map: toilets inside DisneyLand, buildings visible from air
photos, private facilities with a history of public "permissive" use.
If OSM encourages others to use the OSM data base.. why cannot they add
data that is 'private' to them?
If renderers were not to render any access=private object then the general
public would not be aware of these 'private' objects and
those who want them may enter them and configure there own render to show
'their' data alongside OSM data.
One idea is to only map stuff that is 'publicly viewable'. Some define this
as 'from a public place' such as a street. However with satellite views
being publicly available then mapping things that are not viewable from a
public street becomes possible with more accuracy than that of a visual
estimation from a public street.
I think that mapping stuff that is not usefull, in some way, is a waste of
time, public stuff or private stuff. If a person with authority wants to
map private stuff .. then I think that is OK. The key is the authority.
And then the definition of 'private' is?
Are Universities 'private'? Are bicycle repair stations inside university
grounds private?
Are private swimming pools in backyards to be mapped as they may be used in
an emergency to fight fires?
The boundaries between private and public are grey ... and then their is
community emergency use. Murky waters.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
