On Mar 2, 2015 12:07 PM, "Bryce Nesbitt" <bry...@obviously.com> wrote:
> I'm opening a discussion about at least mechanically re-tagging operator:type=private > into "access=no" or "access=private", so that rendering software can choose to omit these locations depending on the map purpose. I'm supportive of this change. Limited access toilets exist, I don't see why we can't broaden the current definition of the tag to disambiguate access.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
