On 30.01.2015 17:17, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote: > The goal was to describe an allready in use practice about the removed: > prefix which I thought defered from the destroyed: prefix which was intended > for features that once were, but were destroyed, while the removed: prefix > is a more generic case where some mapper discover on the ground that a real > life object in fact does not exists
Looking at the taginfo pages for the removed:power key, which has been quoted as an example of the practice, I notice that only 8 users have last edited a feature with that tag. With removed:design, the number even goes down to 1! Combined with the very limited geographical spread, I strongly doubt that the removed: prefix is as commonly used as the page suggests. So imo the page has no business being in the Key namespace. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
