Hi,
dieterdreist wrote > thank you all for your comments, user:RicoZ, the creator of that page also > agreed and has changed the description. In fact, the creator of the above mentionned wiki page copy/pasted the page I originally created to document the removed: prefix here : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:removed The goal was to describe an allready in use practice about the removed: prefix which I thought defered from the destroyed: prefix which was intended for features that once were, but were destroyed, while the removed: prefix is a more generic case where some mapper discover on the ground that a real life object in fact does not exists (and that mapper does not know if that real life object once existed or not), and after removing it, is faced with another (harmchair) mapper re-adding again that feature. ----- -- sly, contact direct : sylvain /a\ letuffe o r g http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Lifecycle-concepts-REMOVED-tp5831677p5831969.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
