2015-01-29 8:43 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > OSM should map current situation - not what was there or what will be. >
what was there and what will be is part of the current situation. > > "after it is obvious the proposed road will never be built" sounds nice but > always there will be somebody convinced that proposal is real. For example > my city has multiple proposed roads - that are in official planes for > decades > (one since at least 1960s), with start of construction "within 25 years" > since > initial proposal. > you don't _have_ to enter this kind of feature, in the end it is up to the mappers to decide what to insert and what not, and in the cases you describe above, it seems of few interest to add these, but in other cases it might make sense. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
