On 19 January 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Kiselev <dkise...@osm.me> wrote: >> In my country, both numbers are used concurrently >> and together with street name > > Such thing, that you use conscription numbers > and street numbers all together in a same time > doesn't make conscription numbers "not an address"
I didn't say it's not an address at all, but it's not a separate address. It's just a part of a regular address. > You've said: > >> Praha, 606 might be not unique inside whole Praha without neighborhood >> name. > > Ok, in such case "Praha, Central district, 606" should be unique, am I > right? > > If conscription numbers, in your country are not valid without quarter or > district or block > (I don't know how you name such subdivisions within cites) it should be > tagged. Addr:street + addr:conscriptionnumber + addr:streetnumber (if exists) is enough on a building to be correctly addressed in most of the cases except where a building administratively belongs to a different district in which it is located geographically, or if it's a village with no street numbers (those a special cases we're not talking about at the moment). > And in such case, it's two addresses > (ok they are binded together, it's not a problem), isn't it? No, it's not two addresses, it's just a single one. It's just a particular feature of it that you can omit a part of it (either of the building numbers or sometimes the street name if you have the conscription number). -- Cheers, Andrew _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
