> In my country, both numbers are used concurrently > and together with street name
Such thing, that you use conscription numbers and street numbers all together in a same time doesn't make conscription numbers "not an address" You've said: > Praha, 606 might be not unique inside whole Praha without neighborhood name. Ok, in such case "Praha, Central district, 606" should be unique, am I right? If conscription numbers, in your country are not valid without quarter or district or block (I don't know how you name such subdivisions within cites) it should be tagged. And in such case, it's two addresses (ok they are binded together, it's not a problem), isn't it? Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:10:11 +0100 от Andrew Shadura <and...@shadura.me>: >On 19 January 2015 at 11:33, Friedrich Volkmann < b...@volki.at > wrote: >> I have been living in this country for all my life, and I worked at a post >> office for some months. So you can safely believe my statements. But all you >> mind to say it that it's all untrue. Well, maybe you also say that the >> heliocentric system is untrue, and that Man was created 4000 BC. I hope you >> are fine in your universe. > >If your country has effectively abolished conscription numbers, this >is one thing. Another this is how they work in countries where they're >used all the time. In my country, both numbers are used concurrently >and together with street name, and this country together with a >neighbouring country are the largest users of this addressing system >to date. > >-- >Cheers, > Andrew > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
