On 30 June 2014 14:30, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > the wikipedia key is still human readable > where the wikidata is just an encrypted interdatabase foreign key.
A Wikidata ID is part of a URL and can be rendered as such; for example, Q173882 equates to <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q173882> > I would consider elements exclusively tagged with wikidata as a > pollution Please tone down the hyperbole > like any other unusable 'ref's to external resources. It's not "unusable"; see URL, above. > And one of the mentionned > example is providing the building operator only through the > "wikipedia:operator" where most of the data consumers are simply > looking for the "operator" tag. I discover a semantic shift where > traditional OSM tags are slowly replaced by wikipedia contributors > eyes and habits. OSM is best used for "on the ground" data. There's no point in trying to use it to replicate all the data held in other databases. An example I've given previsouly is that the Wikidata entry for Q173882 (which is St Paul's Cathedral in London) links to the MusicBrainz entry for the cathedral, and that tells us which musical works have been premiered there. We wouldn't want to use OSM to store lists of works premiered in the buildings we map. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
