I'm strongly in favour of having the order as described here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
The advantage is that they sort near to what they apply to, name:etymology:wikidata is near to name, operator:wikidata is near to operator and so on. I'm not sure why we have 2 pages describing wikidata in the wiki... both with different content. Polyglot 2014-06-30 13:19 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <[email protected]>: > On 30 June 2014 10:34, Andreas Goss <[email protected]> wrote: > >> but I was aware it conflicts with the language version > > > > > > The best solution would be to just use Wikidata. If editors supported > that, > > then they could also always show the titel of the Wikidata tag to avoid > > errors. > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata > > I'm very strongly in faviour of tagging with Wikidata IDs; see my > project proposal, at: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Pigsonthewing/Wikipedia > > but the level of understanding needed presents a high barrier to entry. > > I think we should continue to allow editors to tag with links to > Wikipedia articles, but have the editing tool, or a bot, convert the > tag to one with the equivalent Wikidata ID (or perhaps add a Wikidata > tag, leaving the Wikipedia tag in situ). > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
