On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:52:13PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > Am 03/apr/2014 um 21:43 schrieb Richard Z <ricoz....@gmail.com>: > > > > so again: *** <<a small creek in a forest valley int the mountains >> *** > > > > Where is your aerial imagery? I want that!!!!!! > > > you don't need imagery, you simply draw a segment with the approx. length of > the bridge. If you have no reliable sources, putting a node won't make this > more accurate neither. That's not an argument for softening the topology > rules.
at least a node won't pretend pecision which is not there. We have dams, fords, weirs as either node or way. It is normal to map them as a single node for smaller structures and as way when they are worth it. Why not bridges? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Topology_rules&action=edit&redlink=1 I think that page is waiting to be written. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
