2014-04-02 16:41 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. <ricoz....@gmail.com>: > have something revolutionary simple in my sleeve for the case where > a highway is going over a waterway: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:bridge#Simple_one-node_brunnels_for_way_over_waterway > > We have been thinking about it for a while and it seems there is > some demand which could justify it. >
you mean, let's go a step back if we can't convince really everybody to map according to the standards? ;-) IMHO there is a fundamental problem to your proposal because you want to connect 2 ways with a node which are in reality disjunct (and then you will "fix" it with a tag that explains that there is no connection). I do not believe that this will make things easier, my guess is that inventing exceptions like this will confuse mappers and blur the idea of our topological model. It is also a significant loss of detail because you reduce the length of the bridge to 0. cheers, Martin _______ You call it brunnel, I'd call it tudge ;-)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
