2014-04-03 1:53 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com>: > Rationale in the Wiki says this would save us database space, we would > have 2 ways and 1 node less per bridge. Also, that maintaining one node is > easier than maintaining 3 ways. Lastly, problem of pretending you have > drawn a little bridge precise, when you didn't. > > All of these are valid points, >
FWIW, it is not true, we would "save" 1 way or 2, but the amount of nodes would remain the same, because with the new proposal the waterway would get an extra node which it hasn't otherwise. The 1 way saved is on the other hand loss of information as pointed out before. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
