On 13 November 2013 23:53, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 November 2013 23:06, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
> In which case,I don't think the already well-established access tags > are what you should be using for this. bicycle=no means "you can't > ride a bicycle along here", not "there's a no cycling sign" that also > has other implications for different classes of user. If someone > (additionally or alternatively) wants to tag that a certain way has a > certain (most likely) country-specific status that implies certain > access restrictions on it, then it would be better to use different > tags for this. Yes, that solution would be perfectly fine with me. I just wanted to state that specifically stating all access restrictions for all types of vehicles might be tedious. > In short, I don't see why you can't tag the roads you're talking about > with bicycle=no (or maybe something like bicycle=restricted for the > cases where more significant use is allowed) and then add a second tag > along the lines of bicycle:restriction=DE:use_cycleway to capture the > fact that the legal exclusion of bikes is because of X country's > parallel cycleway rules. That's basically what I proposed yesterday :). -- Matthijs _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
