And why not? What's the difference between "road: you may not cycle, cyclepath: you may cycle" and "road: you may only cycle on the cyclepath, cyclepath: you may cycle"? And if it's such an important difference, why only use this for cyclists? Why not put a "motor_vehicle:use_carriageway" on the cyclepath?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Am 14/nov/2013 um 00:53 schrieb "Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)" < > robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com>: > > > > I don't see why you can't tag the roads you're talking about > > with bicycle=no (or maybe something like bicycle=restricted for the > > cases where more significant use is allowed) and then add a second tag > > along the lines of bicycle:restriction=DE:use_cycleway to capture the > > fact that the legal exclusion of bikes is because of X country's > > parallel cycleway rules. > > > You shouldn't do it, because it would be wrong. There is no legal > exclusion of bikes on the road, there is an obligation - under certain > circumstances - to use the cycleway, this is a difference and should not be > tagged like an exclusion of bikes on the road (e.g. like on a motorway) > > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
