Nope, the only difference is a way changes from a way that can contain
cycles to a route that can't, it's an access issue.
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 10/10/2013 19:18, Mike N wrote:
On 10/10/2013 2:13 PM, fly wrote:
>What about hints to the router that it's OK to send cyclists on this
>route instead of taking a longer route? Knowing that speed = walking
>speed + time to mount/dismount allows it to make a decision when to
take
>a longer fully rideable route VS dismounting.
And why do you need bicycle=dismount for this ?
Think the width of the footpath is much more important.
Nope, the width of the path is the same - the only difference is the
side rails and the "bicyclists must dismount" sign.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
