On 2012-11-21 22:45, Jo wrote :
Adding 1000 nodes to the OSM DB, which are meant to be deleted once
again seems like some sort of pollution.
I said: non obtrusive. That is, believed to be harmless. That is, not
seen on the map, not retrieved by any application, just appearing on
both OSMI and OSMOSE.
There are many more than 1000 things in OSM whose destination is
destruction. Resembling this Zone 30, all the FIXMEs here and there,
like quite a number of "admin_level shouldn't be 4" on the borderline of
England (without telling what it should be ("what do I try next, 8?") ).
A French guy on the GPS list said that those POIs saved him money. But I
won't fight for that ;-)
On the other hand it would be possible to join them to the ways, since
the ways need to be split anyway as the maxspeed changes there.
Ouch. They are POIs, so, often near the middle of the way, probably at a
school door.
The best you could do is extend them by 100 m both side.
That would mean that the POIs' data wouldn't be flashing, that nobody
would care to check and that real bogus data would have been introduced.
Kaly nychta,
Avrio to proï, Gèrètè ( don' t know much). добрый вечер. пока.
Polyglot
2012/11/21 A.Pirard.Papou <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
<mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>
On 2012-11-21 14:47, Sander Deryckere wrote :
Always take some time, you knew that uploading 1000 POI wasn't
going to be appreciated.
Uploading bugs to OpenStreetBugs is very easy. A few lines of
bash or perl code would do
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetBugs/API_0.6#addPOIexec
I'm sorry not to always make every answer personal.
I have just been round correcting a 20+ bugs of OSB over a rather
large area (low density).
Most of what I did was erasing the requests because they had
already been corrected outside OSB, even 1 or 2 years ago. Other
bugs were saying things like "priority is the other way" without
thinking that if it was corrected outside OSB too, doing what is
said would set the priority wrong again.
On the other hand, we have just heard of Teddy: kudos, Teddy:
I have worked with http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ hto fix error
of routing. 2 months of work and hundreds of roads have been
corrected in Wallonia and in the surrounding area. Pffff, it is
well advanced...
New crater on Earth.
<http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=5.23069&lat=50.14893&zoom=8&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,unconnected_minor1,unconnected_minor2,unconnected_minor5>
This is why I believe more in OSMI/OSMOSE than in OSB.
But the problem isn't in uploading to OSB or OSM, it's checking
if there isn't already a speed limit present. The OSM database
shouldn't be filled with duplicate data if the data is already
okay. For OSB, this might be less of a problem, but it's still
not wanted.
As I have just explained, someone finding an already corrected
problem is just half surprised, the less if he is warned why, and
he feels like working terribly fast ;)
I betcha some would rush
Does anyone see a way on how to achieve this?
Да. Jo the Polyglot, winfi...@gmail.com
<mailto:winfi...@gmail.com> as he wrote this afternoon
On 2012-11-21 16:53, Jo wrote :
I may have a way to upload them to OSB. The API is indeed quite
accessible. In order to take out the ones that are already in the
OSM data, I can download all the maxspeed=30 with Overpass API
and remove the ones which have end nodes near to them.
I'll see what I can do with some help from PostGIS.
Polyglot
I'm standing by, finger on the trigger. When you want.
Cheers,
André.
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
talk...@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk...@openstreetmap.org>
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
talk...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
