On 18.11.2012 19:08, Johan C wrote: > Unfortunately, exit_to is not documented. The destination in my opinion > has same purpose as exit_to, but is a better choice because you can use > it on both outgoing parts of the Y-branch and because you can use in in > conjunction with destination:lanes. Some questions on this: > > 1. Have you ever used exit_to?
No. > 2. Have you ever used destination? Yes, but only for small-scale experiments with lane tagging so far. I plan to use it exclusively in the future. > 3. are you willing to document exit_to? No, it's a dead end in my opinion. I would be willing to add a link to "destination". > 4. is it clear for you when to use exit_to and when to use destination? Yes: Don't use exit_to anymore. ;) > 5. do you have any problems (and if so: which ones) when the exit_to > description is removed from the wiki? It's still in the database, so someone encountering it should be able to learn what it means. However, I suggest to prominently point out the existence of destination as a superior alternative where that isn't already the case. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
