Sorry, I didn't want to be rude. I only want to show an example why those special characters - that from time to time are suggested - will not work.
Martin 2012/10/17 Tobias Johansson <t...@mensa.se>: > 2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: >> 2012/10/17 Tobias Johansson <t...@mensa.se>: >>> Since It was your first idea I wanted to tell you my first idea. That >>> is to let the diveders in the lanes tag represent the lines. >>> | (solid line) >>> : (dashed line) >>> :| (crossable from on side) >>> turn:lanes=left:through|through|:right (for example) >> >> Seen something similar like this earlier. >> > > I hadn't > >> >>> 2 big drawbacks. >>> 1. The :lanes tag is not "one" tag so there will be inconsistencies. >> >> That is the main reason why it will not work. If you use a separate >> key you don't have this problem. You now might suggest (as done >> earlier by others) something like this: >> >> somekey=|:\|:| >> > > I would n ot have done this. > >> Can you tell me what this means? No? See the problem? >> > > This tone certinally does not promote progress so I will leave this > discussion now. > > Best Regards Tobias > >> >> Martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
