2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>:
> 2012/10/17 Tobias Johansson <t...@mensa.se>:
>> Since It was your first idea I wanted to tell you my first idea. That
>> is to let the diveders in the lanes tag represent the lines.
>> | (solid line)
>> : (dashed line)
>> :| (crossable from on side)
>> turn:lanes=left:through|through|:right   (for example)
>
> Seen something similar like this earlier.
>

I hadn't

>
>> 2 big drawbacks.
>> 1. The :lanes tag is not "one" tag so there will be inconsistencies.
>
> That is the main reason why it will not work. If you use a separate
> key you don't have this problem. You now might suggest (as done
> earlier by others) something like this:
>
> somekey=|:\|:|
>

I would n ot have done this.

> Can you tell me what this means? No? See the problem?
>

This tone certinally does not promote progress so I will leave this
discussion now.

Best Regards Tobias

>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to