Since It was your first idea I wanted to tell you my first idea. That is to let the diveders in the lanes tag represent the lines. | (solid line) : (dashed line) :| (crossable from on side) turn:lanes=left:through|through|:right (for example)
2 big drawbacks. 1. The :lanes tag is not "one" tag so there will be inconsistencies. 2. Not backwards compatible (all lanes tags would be solid lines now I think..) But if somebody could solve those two, I think it would be a very sleek idea? Best Regads Tobias 2012/10/17 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > Hi! > > Obviously we need some kind of tagging for lane dividers. Initially > when writing the :lanes proposal I though about reusing the divider > proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divider > > But this has one serious drawback: if you have a road with four lanes > you would tag e.g. turn:lanes=left|through|through|right . That's four > lane-values. But if you want to tag the dividers you would need > divider:lanes=solid_line|dots|solid_lane . That's three lane-values. > In my opinion that's not a good idea - I would like to have the same > number of lane-values for all keys. > > Now (a time ago) I came up with something different: have a look at > part 3 of the first example: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/LaneMapping * > > Please keep in mind that's just a first idea! What do you think? > > Martin > > * Please ignore the rest of the page. Well maybe except the discussion > about the destination tags ;-) > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
