>Only part 5 is relevant. Having just returned from my (mapping) trip, and having finally browsed through all these messages on this subjet, I don't think anybody mentioned it explicitly: You can't consider only part 5. At part 6, the ways are physically separated, so IMO there should be two separate nodes on the 5 - 6 border. With two nodes there, the transition from one way (part 4) two two ways happens during part 5. Often, but not always, before the physical separation begins, the solid line is of convenient length for said transition.
>Assume there is no physical separation just a >double line between the upper and lower two lanes. How would you tag >this: >a) One way with lanes=4 >b) Two separate ways with lanes=2 each >c) Tell me! Depending on the length of part 5, fully b, or if it's a really long part, first as one way, and as two ways from the point where one or both of those ways' angles match the angles of the ways in part 6. Where I'd draft the definition of "match" as "equals, or makes a bit shallower or a bit steeper angle with the orientation of the part 5 carriageway"; this is to say "no abrupt right-left-curves, but don't do separate ways at the start of a long decelaration lane either". -- Alv _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
