2012/10/16 Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> > I'd go with option b. Despite being a single way, you're committed to > taking the ramp by that point (due to the double-white solid lines), making > it functionally an extension of the ramp.
The OP explicitly asks you to focus on section 5 alone, NOT on section 5 as the introduction to section 6.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
