David Paleino wrote: > Why, oh why, this seems so out-of-context to me? > I think I already gave a solution: if you want to do it simple, use > sidewalk=*. > If you want to add more details, follow my proposal.
I'm not remotely interested in the merits or otherwise of your proposal. I don't have the time to watch every single thing that goes through this list and assess whether I need to patch Potlatch 2 to have an inviting UI to support it. What I am saying is: you can't just say, as you did, "it's not up to me to consider how this will be implemented in Potlatch" (or, indeed, any other editor). It is _absolutely_ up to you. You're the one who wants the proposal to be adopted. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-RFC-Sidewalks-as-separate-ways-tp6205524p6207468.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
