On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:42:37 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 3/25/2011 4:37 AM, David Paleino wrote: > > Routing, not rendering. We don't care about rendering, do you? > > We certainly care about rendering. What we perhaps shouldn't care about > is how a specific renderer handles tags. > > I personally don't care much about routing. I'm an old-fashioned guy who > prefers to look at the map and determine where to turn based on it.
I probably conveyed the wrong message. We care about rendering, but it shouldn't be a showstopper for, nor an argument against, any tagging scheme. (and I don't understand why it was used "against" my proposal: they would be rendered as normal footways, which makes perfectly sense IMHO). Sorry for not being clearer, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
