On 1/23/2011 8:39 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 01/21/2011 12:40 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Paul
Johnson<baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On 01/17/2011 01:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul
Johnson<baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the
propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage emphasizing
other traffic control devices (particularly signals that are permanently
flashing yellow).
Maybe they don't have overhead blinkers in states that begin with O,
but around here there are a couple two- or four-way stops with
single-ball signals suspended from wires.
Maybe they don't have yellow flashing signals in states that don't start
with O or W, but such signals are extremely common to the point that you
might as well map Bott's Dots on the pavement surface while you're at it.
What's your point? I'm talking about the overhead type that acts just
like a permanently-blinking traffic signal, not the small lights
mounted above or below warning signs.
There's not a legal distinction between the two?
We don't map only based on legal distinctions.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
