On 01/21/2011 12:40 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Paul Johnson > <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> On 01/17/2011 01:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Johnson >>> <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>>> Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the >>>> propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage emphasizing >>>> other traffic control devices (particularly signals that are permanently >>>> flashing yellow). >>> >>> Maybe they don't have overhead blinkers in states that begin with O, >>> but around here there are a couple two- or four-way stops with >>> single-ball signals suspended from wires. >> >> Maybe they don't have yellow flashing signals in states that don't start >> with O or W, but such signals are extremely common to the point that you >> might as well map Bott's Dots on the pavement surface while you're at it. > > What's your point? I'm talking about the overhead type that acts just > like a permanently-blinking traffic signal, not the small lights > mounted above or below warning signs.
There's not a legal distinction between the two?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
