On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On 01/17/2011 01:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Johnson >> <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >>> Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the >>> propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage emphasizing >>> other traffic control devices (particularly signals that are permanently >>> flashing yellow). >> >> Maybe they don't have overhead blinkers in states that begin with O, >> but around here there are a couple two- or four-way stops with >> single-ball signals suspended from wires. > > Maybe they don't have yellow flashing signals in states that don't start > with O or W, but such signals are extremely common to the point that you > might as well map Bott's Dots on the pavement surface while you're at it.
What's your point? I'm talking about the overhead type that acts just like a permanently-blinking traffic signal, not the small lights mounted above or below warning signs. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging