2011/1/4 Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com>: > I have a feeling we discussed this a few months ago. My suggestion > would be to simply use numbers, if you're talking about a ranking > scheme: > > aeroway=aerodrome > aerodrome_level=1|2|3|4|5
I agree. This does not mean that we cannot additionally tag services and facilities offered or characteristics like the length and surface of the runway. (Maybe we also need even more levels, e.g. in German discussions there were (maybe disputable) voices from people to even tag RC-"Airfields" with these aviation tags). For most people that try to render a map, a simple hierarchical classification (like the suggested "aerodrome_level") is sufficient (btw.: this does apply to almost all other features as well). > Also, I definitely think we should try and align to external standards. +1 cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
