Am 13.11.2010 12:58, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2010/11/13 Ulf Lamping<ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com>:
Am 13.11.2010 12:04, schrieb Morten Kjeldgaard:
How is landcover=trees any more helpful then widely used landuse /
natural?!?
in the case of landuse: landuse=residential, landcover trees ? Or
natural=beach, landcover trees? Landuse is the _usage_ of an area.
How is landcover orthogonal to landuse / natural?
landuse is the usage of the land, natural is used to denote features
like summits, cave entrances, beaches, bays, ...
No.
Have a look at the natural section of:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
heath, scree, scrub, fell, sand is what you think what landcover should
be. We already have that.
Regards, ULFL
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging