On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:42 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/19 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: >> Neither of those is quite correct. A paper street is an unoccupied >> right-of-way that is recognized by the local government in the same >> way as it recognizes the right-of-way of a public street. > > that's why I would map them. But I still don't see the difference > between a proposed road and a paper road (or why a "paper road" can't > be mapped as highway=proposed).
By that definition, I don't see why it can't be mapped as highway=path or highway=track (or, I guess in some cases, highway=swamp). If it's a recognized right of way, then it's not proposed, it's actual. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
