On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:37 AM, John F. Eldredge <j...@jfeldredge.com>wrote:
> "Paper streets" in a partially-built subdivision are more likely to be > developed in the near future than is a totally-imaginary city located where > no development is currently planned. So, they are likely to be of more > interest to people. Any such proposed streets should be replaced, over > time, as real construction takes place. > > Chances are that, as real development takes place, some of the real streets > will be in the originally-planned locations, and some won't be. > > I think that OSM should by a project about mapping the present, not the past or the future. What is the "near future" ? 2 months, 2 years, 20 years ? We have far enough to do just to keep the data up to date. my 2 cents Pieren
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
