On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/8 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: >>> still it isn't at all a forest. >> >> It is a forest - a clearing within a forest. > > There is no point in tagging it as a forest. I know that you can > generalize it like this. It's the same point as with a lake inside a > forest. Is the lake part of the forest, or not? This depends on the > point of view, and can be answered either way. But it is not helpful > for the data consumer to not give them the chance to decide (because > they don't have the info).
Hence landuse=forest landcover=grass. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
