I'd forgotten about that--good point. Although surface as currently used seems to be mainly in the context of roads.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Could this not be collapsed into with "surface=*"? If not, what would be > the relationship/difference between "surface" and "landcover"? > > > On 07/10/2010 19:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> I know we already talked about this, but actually no actions followed ;-) >> >> What is the current feeling for a new key "landcover"? Could resolve >> many issues, as often landuse is a mixture of actual "use" and >> "coverage". >> Seems like there is already landcover=tree in the database: >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/landcover >> >> other values might be >> >> * sand >> * asphalt >> * grass >> * scrubs >> * rock >> * ice >> * lichen >> >> <add your proposed values here> >> >> cheers, >> Martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
