Well, you presumably would have an intermediate step in which the railway is no longer being used for train traffic, but the rails and crossties (also known as sleepers) have not yet been taken up, so it isn't suitable yet for use as a cycleway.
-------Original Email------- Subject :Re: [Tagging] inconsistencies in bridge >From :mailto:l...@xs4all.nl Date :Mon Sep 27 09:39:53 America/Chicago 2010 On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: > What about abandoned=yes ? And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to whatever bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there anymore is just that: not there anymore. It doesn't deserve a bridge=* tag. That's one thing I've never really understood with railway=abandoned either. Sure, many of them have been converted into might fine cycleways, but that's just what they are now: cycleways. -- Lennard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
