On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:50 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > recently there was introduced some weird stuff in bridge: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge > > bridge=yes > bridge=aqueduct > bridge=viaduct > bridge=swing > bridge=abandoned > bridge=... > > I'm fine with yes, but also aqueduct, viaduct, swing may be OK, > indicating all a special kind of structure, some of them maybe not > necessarily bridges (e.g. aqueduct: how do you tag the parts that are > solid walls and don't allow to pass under?), but they follow some > logics. > > But abandoned? How would that fit into bridge typology? Looking at the > page history the author put "former" before this, and then changed to > abandoned. Both are status-tags. How would I proceed to tag a > abandoned aqueduct? I don't think it's a good idea to mix status an > typology.
This is the same as railways: you can have railway=tram or railway=abandoned, so how do you tag an abandoned tramway? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
