recently there was introduced some weird stuff in bridge:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
bridge=yes
bridge=aqueduct
bridge=viaduct
bridge=swing
bridge=abandoned
bridge=...
I'm fine with yes, but also aqueduct, viaduct, swing may be OK,
indicating all a special kind of structure, some of them maybe not
necessarily bridges (e.g. aqueduct: how do you tag the parts that are
solid walls and don't allow to pass under?), but they follow some
logics.
But abandoned? How would that fit into bridge typology? Looking at the
page history the author put "former" before this, and then changed to
abandoned. Both are status-tags. How would I proceed to tag a
abandoned aqueduct? I don't think it's a good idea to mix status an
typology.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
