Am 17.09.2010 09:09, schrieb John Smith:
2010/9/17 Matthias Meißer<dig...@arcor.de>:
>  Therefore I suggest the wiki as 'neutral' plattform that allows everybody to
>  monitor changes and to do colloborate work (even if its bad for discussion
>  that has to take place somewhere else)
The wiki isn't good, since most people won't be monitoring all changes
just to notice something new has occurred, it is also a very poor
platform to facilitate discussion...
As we said yes it's not good for discussions but it offers monitoring abilities, changability and embedding/linking to other tags etc.

>  Both is fine but there we have the problem how others get notified. So as
>  said I would preffer a non ML sollution as you would preffer a non forums
>  solution:)  So first place can be wiki?
Simply stating we should use the wiki isn't helpful, as people that
prefer forums will continue to use forums, others will use country
based mailing lists and so on, this isn't helpful.
Ok but it's hard to crosscomunicate. The only possibility I see are projects like:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates
http://blog.openstreetmap.de (german week review)
Or we establish a central base where we collect ideas/grow them up. This refers to the garage/incubator idea that changes /Proposed features to a less voting centered platform.

Matthias

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to